NetBeans 6 delivers great updates to the Matisse GUI builder. Spend a few minutes with Roman Strobl and get an expert briefing on what's new and what has changed. (sponsored)
In this, the third and final installation of Andres' Introduction to Groovy series, you learn about how Groovy handles variable numbers of arguments, named parameters, currying, and more about Groovy operators. Including, some new operators.
Swing Fuse (actually just Fuse), is a framework designed to make it easier to create your own custom desktop components. In this article, Daniel Spiewak shows you how to get started and provides sample source code you can download.
Willam Louth shows how he uses JXInsight Probes to investigate probable performance issues with code bases that he is not familiar with. He also highlights possible pitfalls in creating a benchmark, as well as in the analysis of results.
A milestone for the Java Community—the
Belgian Java Users Group
, BeJUG, and the
Brazilian Java Users Group
, SouJava, are jointly submitting the first JSR filed by a Java Users Group: a language JSR for JDK7. In the spirit of openness exemplified by the open-source JDK and Sun Microsystem's acceptance of leadership outside its own organization, the expert group will do its work on a publicly-readable mailing list.
The Closures for Java language extension was first described in a JavaPolis 2006 presentation (view talk on
Parleys.com
), and has been an active topic of discussion at conferences, message boards, and blogs. The text of the JSR submission was negotiated earlier this year, and
published at the end of April
. One detail remained a mystery, though: who is the submitting organization? Now it had been revealed that the proposal will be a joint submission from the Belgian and Brazilian JUGs! It was formally submitted to the JCP on Wednesday, November 7, 2007.
The JSR will be presented next month at JavaPolis 2007 in Antwerp, Belgium.
BeJUG and SouJava are definitely a couple of very proactive volunteer organizations. Regardless of whether you think this JSR is a good idea, it's great to see this kind of diversity playing a part in the shaping of Java.
It does not seem to have a formal JSR number yet, but that may only be generated, if the request is accepted?
Some of the people mentioned as interested partners are also actively involved in other JSRs or even lead them, so I hope, to meet most of them and also find out more about this JSR, when presenting another JSR for Java 7 at JavaPolis myself...
For the record, here is a clarification of the original announcement as posted by Stefan Janssen of BeJUG:
"Both Google and Sun Microsystems have requested following clarification in regards to our newsflash from November 11th 2007.
"Google had no part in the BeJUG newsflash/announcement and no involvement in any Closures JSR."
"We regret any confusion that may have been caused by this mailing, and by the premature release of the details of the 'smaller language features' JSR."
"We misspoke when we said that "This will be the first Java language JSR led outside of Sun Microsystems." Of course no JSR can proceed without approval from the JCP EC, which has not yet been secured."
First JSR filed by a Java Users Group
URL: JSR Proposal: Closures for Java
At 1:54 AM on Nov 12, 2007, Geertjan wrote:
Fresh Jobs for Developers Post a job opportunity
A milestone for the Java Community—the Belgian Java Users Group , BeJUG, and the Brazilian Java Users Group , SouJava, are jointly submitting the first JSR filed by a Java Users Group: a language JSR for JDK7. In the spirit of openness exemplified by the open-source JDK and Sun Microsystem's acceptance of leadership outside its own organization, the expert group will do its work on a publicly-readable mailing list.
The Closures for Java language extension was first described in a JavaPolis 2006 presentation (view talk on Parleys.com ), and has been an active topic of discussion at conferences, message boards, and blogs. The text of the JSR submission was negotiated earlier this year, and published at the end of April . One detail remained a mystery, though: who is the submitting organization? Now it had been revealed that the proposal will be a joint submission from the Belgian and Brazilian JUGs! It was formally submitted to the JCP on Wednesday, November 7, 2007.
The JSR will be presented next month at JavaPolis 2007 in Antwerp, Belgium.
4 replies so far (
Post your own)
Re: First JSR filed by a Java Users Group
BeJUG and SouJava are definitely a couple of very proactive volunteer organizations. Regardless of whether you think this JSR is a good idea, it's great to see this kind of diversity playing a part in the shaping of Java.Cheers,
David
Re: First JSR filed by a Java Users Group
It does not seem to have a formal JSR number yet, but that may only be generated, if the request is accepted?Some of the people mentioned as interested partners are also actively involved in other JSRs or even lead them, so I hope, to meet most of them and also find out more about this JSR, when presenting another JSR for Java 7 at JavaPolis myself...
Re: First JSR filed by a Java Users Group
For the record, here is a clarification of the original announcement as posted by Stefan Janssen of BeJUG:"Both Google and Sun Microsystems have requested following clarification in regards to our newsflash from November 11th 2007.
"Google had no part in the BeJUG newsflash/announcement and no involvement in any Closures JSR."
"We regret any confusion that may have been caused by this mailing, and by the premature release of the details of the 'smaller language features' JSR."
"We misspoke when we said that "This will be the first Java language JSR led outside of Sun Microsystems." Of course no JSR can proceed without approval from the JCP EC, which has not yet been secured."
Re: First JSR filed by a Java Users Group
Thanks, but this article didn't refer to Google at all. So, your clarification doesn't clarify anything in this context.