Popular @
Forum Controls
Spotlight Features
The Rich Engineering Heritage Behind Dependency Injection
Andrew McVeigh takes us on a tour of the rich heritage behind dependency injection, what it represents, and tells us why its here to stay.
NetBeans 6: Matisse Updates
NetBeans 6 delivers great updates to the Matisse GUI builder. Spend a few minutes with Roman Strobl and get an expert briefing on what's new and what has changed. (sponsored)
Introduction to Groovy Part 3
In this, the third and final installation of Andres' Introduction to Groovy series, you learn about how Groovy handles variable numbers of arguments, named parameters, currying, and more about Groovy operators. Including, some new operators.
Easier Custom Components with Swing Fuse
Swing Fuse (actually just Fuse), is a framework designed to make it easier to create your own custom desktop components. In this article, Daniel Spiewak shows you how to get started and provides sample source code you can download.
Benchmark Analysis: Guice vs Spring
Willam Louth shows how he uses JXInsight Probes to investigate probable performance issues with code bases that he is not familiar with. He also highlights possible pitfalls in creating a benchmark, as well as in the analysis of results.
A second opinion, please
At 2:50 AM on Jun 25, 2007, Graeme Dunlop wrote:
Fresh Jobs for Developers Post a job opportunity
Reasonably often, I see questions like this which are merely statements copied from some online text, such as a Sun FAQ or product document. I think this is an extremely poor way to create a question and borders on plagiarism. My instinct is to delete the question.
Comments?
(see http://java.sun.com/products/jms/faq.html for the origin of the statements made in the question)
3 replies so far (
Post your own)
Re: A second opinion, please
I think reusing the words from the FAQ is nothing bad if the question is clear and coherent. However in this case it's kinda hard to understand the question and get the right answer. I think the author should put more effort into it.Re: A second opinion, please
Fair enough, and thanks for your comments. I've "restructured" the question.Re: A second opinion, please
I stumbled accidently across your question and have two proposals:1. Change the logic of item b and d. You will surely want to test know-how and not proper reading so remove the negations.
2. Change the character count in item e to 65536 or something; a limit of 10000 sound not plausible.